NEW DELHI: Making radical changes that completely take away
discretionary powers from private-unaided schools, lieutenant governor
Najeeb Jung late on Wednesday released in nursery admission norms for
2014-15 that abolishes the 20% management quota and virtually ensures
that schools would only admit children living within a radius of 6km.
And 5% seats have been reserved for girls.
Under the new guidelines, 70 points out of 100 in the open category
seats have been assigned to the "neighbourhood' head, giving candidates
who live up to 6km away from the school an unbeatable advantage over
others. Kids who have a sibling studying in the school will get 20
points and five points each have been reserved for wards of alumni.
The admission process will begin from January 15, 2014, a fortnight later than last year.
Schools are sure to protest against the new norms which leave them no room to manoeuvre. "I don't think this will go down well with private schools. Nursery admissions have been messed up. The modalities will be difficult to implement. We (private schools) will get together," said Jyoti Bose, principal, Springdales, Dhaula Kuan.
Jung has divided the total seats into categories beyond the standard 25% for economically weaker sections and disadvantaged groups (EWS/DG). He reserves 5% seats for staff children and another five for girls (in co-educational schools). The remaining 65% are "open seats' for the general category.
With government fixing both the criteria and points distribution for admissions, children living in west and north will be at a disadvantage because these areas have far fewer schools that are considered "good'.
Reacting quickly, the National Progressive Schools Conference has called an "emergent meeting of the executive along with the former chairperson and life-members" on Thursday. "We would take a stand on the new norms at the meeting," said NPSC chairperson Ameeta Mulla Wattal.
Minority schools, in which the 25% EWS reservation is not mandatory, have been reminded that they need to reserve 20% for EWS if they have been allotted land by government agencies.
Also, schools "set up for specific government services like armed forces, paramilitary forces, central services, all India services...shall have the right to reserve seats for the wards". This means schools such as Sanskriti as well as convent schools would continue to have the right to reserve seats under special categories.
The process for nursery admissions has been a matter of much litigation over the last few years. In 2007, and again in 2010, lawyer-activist group Social Jurist had challenged in court the government's decision to allow schools to choose categories and assign points. It argued that inclusion of any category (or criterion) beyond the neighbourhood clause was a violation of the RTE Act.
In 2013, the Delhi high court ruled that the RTE Act was not admissible with respect to nursery admissions beyond the 25% EWS seats. The judgment was challenged and the matter is pending in Supreme Court. However, the HC's ruling brought the 2007 notification back into force, which included a provision for aggrieved people to appeal to the LG. Social Jurist duly made a representation to the LG to fixed admission norms, which was followed by a HC direction to him to decide.
The admission process will begin from January 15, 2014, a fortnight later than last year.
Schools are sure to protest against the new norms which leave them no room to manoeuvre. "I don't think this will go down well with private schools. Nursery admissions have been messed up. The modalities will be difficult to implement. We (private schools) will get together," said Jyoti Bose, principal, Springdales, Dhaula Kuan.
Jung has divided the total seats into categories beyond the standard 25% for economically weaker sections and disadvantaged groups (EWS/DG). He reserves 5% seats for staff children and another five for girls (in co-educational schools). The remaining 65% are "open seats' for the general category.
With government fixing both the criteria and points distribution for admissions, children living in west and north will be at a disadvantage because these areas have far fewer schools that are considered "good'.
Reacting quickly, the National Progressive Schools Conference has called an "emergent meeting of the executive along with the former chairperson and life-members" on Thursday. "We would take a stand on the new norms at the meeting," said NPSC chairperson Ameeta Mulla Wattal.
Minority schools, in which the 25% EWS reservation is not mandatory, have been reminded that they need to reserve 20% for EWS if they have been allotted land by government agencies.
Also, schools "set up for specific government services like armed forces, paramilitary forces, central services, all India services...shall have the right to reserve seats for the wards". This means schools such as Sanskriti as well as convent schools would continue to have the right to reserve seats under special categories.
The process for nursery admissions has been a matter of much litigation over the last few years. In 2007, and again in 2010, lawyer-activist group Social Jurist had challenged in court the government's decision to allow schools to choose categories and assign points. It argued that inclusion of any category (or criterion) beyond the neighbourhood clause was a violation of the RTE Act.
In 2013, the Delhi high court ruled that the RTE Act was not admissible with respect to nursery admissions beyond the 25% EWS seats. The judgment was challenged and the matter is pending in Supreme Court. However, the HC's ruling brought the 2007 notification back into force, which included a provision for aggrieved people to appeal to the LG. Social Jurist duly made a representation to the LG to fixed admission norms, which was followed by a HC direction to him to decide.
Engage in insightful discussions about thePrivate vs public high school debate on our education-focused blog. Join the conversation, share your views, and gain valuable insights into the differences between private and public education systems. Explore the nuances, benefits, and challenges of each option while contributing to the ongoing discourse on educational choices.
ReplyDelete